Sojourner Truth Speech - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 590 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2019/07/26 Category People Essay Level High school Tags: Sojourner Truth Essay Did you like this example? Sojourner Truth was an African-American feminist and abolitionist. Truth is arguably most well-known for her speech that she gave in 1851 at the Womens Rights Convention in Ohio. During this period in which Truth lived, abolitionists such as Frederick Douglass and Harriet Tubman were especially effective in making an impression towards their listeners because they incorporated their experiences as ex-slaves. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Sojourner Truth Speech" essay for you Create order Truth delivered her speech as a means to retaliate against anti feminist arguments that were raised during that time. According to History.com, Truths most important legacy is the tone and substance of her language . They go on to use a sample of the speech Give ?em land and an outset, and hab teachers learn ?em to read. Den they can be somebody (Sojourner Truth). By stating such simplicity in such a complex matter, Truth has caused the audience to be stumped not only by the simplicity and frankness of her words but also the simple, homely language that she uses. Additionally, the Poetry Trust claims that the strongest tool of her speech are her argument/persuasion strategies . They continue by saying that by Truth including the racial and sexist issues that she encountered in her life, she provides first hand experience that she executes in a manner that is moving towards audience. She persuades her audience that a black women might deserve equal rights to men (Poetry Trust). By using facts and unarguable evidence as well as her use of deduction she manages to illustrate that women are not inferior to men. Simultaneously, Truth also mentions the relevance of christianity. The Sojourner Truth Memorial Committee says Sojourner Truth sounds like a down-to-earth preacher in her speeches (STMC). Truth points out that someone as significant and as Jesus Christ would not be born without the involvement of a woman. Truth uses her biblical knowledge as a means of connecting with her audience through the system of faith. By making references derived from the Bible, her mostly Christian audiences views her as a fellow Christian and responds to her more positively and supportively. Maria B. Perry of Appalachian State University illustrates the effectivity of rhetorical strategies that Truth uses. Sojourner effectively delivers the powerful message on the hypocrisy, unjust nature and moral inaccuracy of gender and race discrimination (Perry). Truth doesnt just merely state facts, but appeals emotionally to the audience using personal anecdotes as well as repetition in order to represent the injustices that she endured; and eventually elicits a desire for change. Furthermore, Rainer Abraham refers to the end of the speech. If the first woman God ever made was strong enough to turn the world upside down all alone, these women together ought to be able to turn it back, and get it right side up again! And now they asking to do it, the men better let him (Truth). By addressing the past and connecting it to the future, Truth encouraged the women in the audience to band together and and fight. It is perceived that a woman turned the world upside down, butt Truth believed that women together would and should be able to turn the world back up right again. This initiates hope for women, Truth assures women that if they are a united front, they can achieve their rights and equality. Accordingly, Sojourner Truth delivered a very effective and powerful message on the hypocrisy, inequality and inaccuracy of gender and race discrimination. She used her clever anecdotes, religious belief and folk-like language to delineate the injustices during that period to generate a desire for change.

Effective Communication at Workplace - 3033 Words

EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION AT WORKPLACE Definition of Communication Communication is an exchange of feelings, ideas and information, whether by speaking, writing, signals or behaviors. When a person sends or receives information, ideas and feelings with others, they are not only using spoken or written communication but also nonverbal communication. Effective communication skills are necessary for smooth relations with other people. They can be your family, friends, colleagues or even strangers. Communication is engaging in an exchange with another person. Knowing how to communicate effectively will help you get across what you mean more efficiently and can also minimize friction and misunderstandings. Definition of Communication†¦show more content†¦As a boss, you are constantly advising, informing, explaining, discussing, reviewing, counseling, guiding, suggesting, persuading, convincing, coaching, humoring, and responding. Employees seek and deserve a boss who is open, accessible, and responsive. By having frequent direct contact with your employees, listening to what they say, and having honest two-way communication with them, you are far more likely to be the boss they deserve, respect, and trust. And you are far more likely to identify issues before they become problems, and solve problems before they become crises. Skillful communicators understand the importance of verbal and nonverbal communication and use it to increase their effectiveness, as well as use it to understand more clearly what someone else is really saying. Effective communication in the workplace is necessary for productivity and smooth operations. People will get along well, when respect and appreciation is practiced in the workplace. It is important to eliminate negativity in the workplace. This can be done by effective communication skills. When you reduce negativity, communicating will be easier and much. Effective Communication is therefore critical to the success of an organization because:- †¢ Organizations today are becoming more complex both in structure and technology. †¢ Economic and market conditions are forcing greater efficiencyShow MoreRelatedEffective Workplace Communication1336 Words   |  6 PagesListening and Effective Workplace Communication James Humes, a former presidential speech writer, stated that, the art of communication is the language of leadership (Leading Thoughts, 2010). Communication is an essential process that is common in the workplace.   Everyone in the workplace especially leaders must communicate with others.   Ideas, conversations, disagreements, and commitments can all be exchanged through communication.   Anyone can communicate but it takes discipline and skillsRead MoreEffective Communication For The Workplace950 Words   |  4 Pages Someone once said great communication is a skill that is needed in life. I believe great communication can take an individual very far in life. Effective communication helps connect with people. It can open many doors for many jobs. It lets the employer know whom they have hired, and how intelligent the person really is. In the business profession, effective communication enables managers to give understandable instructions to their employees. Effective commu nication will help state what is expectedRead MoreEffective Communication in a Workplace635 Words   |  3 PagesEffective communication in a business Student’s Name: Professor’s Name: Institution: Date of Submission: Describe a time when you experienced effective communication in a business environment. Effective communication involves knowing the audience and using appropriate to communicate the intended message. I experienced effective communication at the workplace whereby the manager delegated the role of decision making to the employees. The manager emphasized that employees were toRead MoreEffective Communication Within A Workplace854 Words   |  4 PagesCommunication skills are very important no matter where or who you are. Communication within a workplace can determine whether a business or individual is successful or not. Understanding effective communication in a medical setting helps hospitals and doctor offices develop a work environment that is able to communicate effectively with coworker, patients and doctors in order to take of the patients needs. Listening, clarity and Patience are three main keys to effective communication within aRead MoreEffective Communication in the Workplace Essay1300 Words   |  6 PagesEffective Communication in the Workplace The workplace is an environment where more and more Americans are spending significant portions of their time. In fact, 25 million workers reported spending at least 49 hours a week at work, (Schabner, 2013). This means that having effective communication in the workplace is becoming increasingly important. Not just to improve business practices, but to improve the quality of both employer AND employee satisfaction. Effective interpersonal communicationRead MoreWorkplace Literacy and Effective Communication1270 Words   |  6 PagesWorkplace Literacy and Effective Communication Recently, there has been a poorly written communication in the workplace, which has led to some hurt feelings, lower morale and possible loss of business. As a corporation, we have worked very hard to maintain the synergy though out our work environment. These latest events are starting to compromise multiple aspects of our company. First, we are losing control and perspective of our colleagues. Camaraderie and atmosphere are suffering, placing usRead MoreEffective Communication in the Workplace Essay1220 Words   |  5 PagesCommunication Barriers in the Workplace Communication barriers in the workplace can have a serious effect on the functioning and of an organization. In the following article we shall understand what some of these communication barriers are and how to overcome them. Ads by Google Improve Communication Our NLP Training Program Helps You Overcome Your Fears. Enroll Today! www.EasyNLP.com/ Conflict Management How much is conflict costing you? Assessment, Training, Coaching www.StrategicLeadershipCoachingRead MoreEffective Communication Strategies For Workplace1221 Words   |  5 Pages Effective Communication Strategies for Workplace Conflict Tanya Schankel ORG300 – Applying Leadership Principles Colorado State University – Global Campus Dr. Anne O Bryan June 14, 2015 Effective Communication Strategies for Workplace Conflict Got Conflict? You are not alone. Conflict is a natural part of our lives. It can occur anytime and anywhere, but it is especially prone to raise its ugly head in the workplace when working with a team. We all have unique differences based on ageRead MoreEffective Communication Within The Workplace1848 Words   |  8 Pagesorganisational communication; it is the communication that happens within the organisational, whether it is face to face communication or video conferences communication. It is important to note that if organisations do not communicate the right information, in the right way, to the right people, at the right time, this could create problems and have an impact on the level of effectiveness and efficiency. In essence, there is therefore a need for effective communication within the workplace. If thereRead MoreEffective Communication in a Diverse Workplace2594 Words   |  11 PagesINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENHANCED RESEARCH IN MANAGEMENT COMPUTER APPLICATIONS VOL. 2 ISSUE 2, FEB.-2013 ISSN NO: 2319-7471 Effective Communication in a Diverse Workplace Ritu Rana Programme Associate, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, New Delhi, India riturana2222@gmail.com Abstract: Due to globalization, today’s work environment has become diverse as people from different cultures, religions and backgrounds have come together. They bring with them, diverse skills, knowledge and expertise.

Cases On Liabilities Undisclosed Principal â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Cases On Liabilities Undisclosed Principal? Answer: Introducation The common law which rules over the relationship which is present between an agent and a principal is the agency law. As per this law, the principal is accountable and has the responsibility towards the third party for work which is done by the agent. This is due to the fact that the agent is the one who represents the principal when they communicate with the third party (Benett, 2014). So, a deal which is made with the agent is considered as one made by the third part with principal. The raison d'tre for holding the principal accounting is the requirement of protecting the third party due to the fact that third party is unaware of the level of authority which is granted to the agent or about the presence or absence or the kind of relationship which is present between a principal and an agent (Hynes, 2014). In Australia, there are two authorities under the common law of agency, and these are actual authority and ostensible/ apparent authority. Under the actual authority given to the agent, the agent is given either the express authority or the implied authority. In the express authority, the agent is told expressly what has to be done and what their authority is. In the implied authority, the authority is given in an implied manner, which is usually incidental to the express authority which has been granted to the agent (Cohen, 2017). The other form of authority which is given to the agents, and probably which attracts a lot of controversy is the ostensible authority. Under the ostensible authority, the conduct of the principal is such that the third party forms a notion that the agent has been given the particular authority to go forward with the task at hand. In short, the apparent authority is apparent through the conduct of the principal. The key point in this authority is that the agent is never given an express authority to do so and only the same is perceived to be present (Allen Kraakman, 2016). The leading case quoted for the purposes of making a case of ostensible authority can be found in the English case of Watteau v Fenwick [1893] 1 QB 346 (Deodhar, 2013). In this case, Watteau was the supplier of the cigars to a beer house and this place was operated by Humble. The sign of the business bore his name and even the license was in Humbles name. Watteau supplied the cigars to Humble and he was not aware of the involvement of Fenwick. Fenwick had never given the authority to Humble to act on his behalf. When the plaintiff was not paid the outstanding amount of 25 pounds, he brought a legal action against the defendant. The court gave the decision in this case in favour of the plaintiff and stated that Humble had the general authority to act on behalf of the defendant due to the display of name on board and on the license. Hence, the plaintiff was compensated for his outstanding payment pursuant to an order of the court by the defendant (H2O, 2013). To establish the presence of authority, the case of Freeman and Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd [1964] 2 QB 4 is amongst the well established cases. The post of director in this case was held by the company and a legal battle had been initiated with this cases plaintiff for the non payment of the architectural fee. The director of the company around whom the case was cantered had never been appointed at the post of managing director of the company but he always portrayed that he was indeed the managing director of the company. Furthermore, the directors of the company also held out the particular director as being the managing director of the company and nothing was done on part of the directors of the company to undo this portrayal. This knowledge of the directors led to the court holding the company accountable for paying the unpaid debts in terms of the architect fee and so, the plaintiff was paid the outstanding sum (Baidu, 2011). This case presented with it four different conditions which are required to be present for undertaking the acts by the agents based on apparent authority. Out of these four, only three are applicable on the Australian companies. In the first condition, the holding out condition is covered. Based on this condition, the representation has to be made through words or through the conduct of the principal, in front of a third party, in which the agent undertakes the words on behalf of the principal and where it is clearly shown that the agent had the requisite authority for entering into the contract in question or the transaction which was undertaken. Under this case, the second relevant condition was that this particular representation had to go from the company who was the holder of the actual authority for undertaking the transaction or for acting on behalf of the company. The last condition in is that the third party has to rely upon representation which was made by the agent when th e transaction in question was being undertaken (Krawitz, 2002). In line with the ruling of this case was the one given under Devren Pty Ltd v Old Coach Developments Pty Ltd and Ors[2015] QSC 53, in which Claires authority had been put under question. But the court had held that Claire had the required apparent authority even when he was not the director of the company and as a result of this, the company was liable for the acts which were done by Claire (Cooper Grace Ward, 2015). Application The facts which are given under the case study point towards Kevin being an agent, who was undertaking transactions on behalf of Mudkey. The reason for holding Mudkey as the agent was that he was appointed by the company as one, after they became aware about the business opportunity. Kevin would also be considered as having the required authority to contract on behalf of Mudkey as he has apparent and actual implied authority. The case of Watteau v Fenwick proves helpful in establishing the presence of actual implied authority. As was present in this case, Kevins name had been displayed prominently on the website of the company as he was holding the post of development manager and it was also shown that a leading role was being played by Kevin in the development of the business of Kevin. This implied that Kevin had the required authority for going forward with the business management and for placing the business service order. Hence, on the basis of the quoted case law, the implied au thority was present with Kevin; and as a result of this, the company has to take responsibility towards Anthony and would be liable for making the requisite payment. It is crucial that the three specific points which were raised in the case of Freeman and Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd, are applied here as these were particularly in the context of the Australian companies. Kevin was clearly being depicted as the agent of the company due to the prominent display of his name and the company holding out him as their agent. There was a representation which flowed from the website of the company to the third party. And the last condition s also fulfilled as reliance was made by Anthony on the presence of authority to act on behalf of the company with Kevin. This would mean that on the basis of apparent authority, Kevin has the relevant authority which would bind Mudkey for the undertaken actions by Kevin. The failure of business cannot be cited as an excuse for the absence of authority. The applicability of Devren Pty Ltd v Old Coach Developments Pty Ltd and Ors would further strengthen the case presented here and Mudkey would have t o go forward with making the payment. As Mudkey had done so, under the threat of legal action, they did the right thing and avoided a legal case from being made against them. To conclude, in this case, Kevin was the holder of both actual implied authority and apparent authority which would require Mudkey to be responsible for the transaction which took place between Anthony and Kevin. The scope of authority is something which is changed on the basis of the manner in which the agency is created, particularly the type of the authority which is given to the agents, as have been previously highlighted. Through this essay, an attempt has been made to show the manner in which this change occurs. The previous segment of this discussion highlighted that there are actual and ostensible authority as the two bifurcations of the agency law authority. In the actual authority, the mutual agreement between the principal and the agent gives rise to the authority and the existence of this authority is based on the particular facts of the case. The general rule is that the principal would be made liable for the acts of the agents only when these are done on the basis of the authority given to the agents and on the basis of the scope of this authority. When the agent crosses the boundary of the authority, given to them, the legal responsibility of the principal is ended, towards the third party. And when such a thing takes place, the agent is made personally liable for the acts done by them towards such a third party as the implied warranty of authority is breached by them (Cox Hazen, 2016). In TB Bright v Kerr [1939] SCR 63, the ratio stated that where the principal is to be made accountable for the actions undertaken by the agent till such period of time, where they act on the basis of the scope of authority given to them (Lexum, 2017). Hence, the express authority, where is crossed by the agent, would make the agent personally liable instead of the principal being made accountable for the agents work. When it comes to the case of implied authority, the work is undertaken by the agent, which is incidental or is necessary for the express authority to be properly executed. Hence, in implied authority, such task is done by the agent which is incidental to the express authority, for holding the principal liable (Fullan, 2014). Though, the game changes when the question of ostensible authority comes into play. This is because under ostensible authority, the principal is made legally responsible even when the agent has not been given the authority to work on their behalf. The reason for this is that under ostensible authority, the agent seems to have the authority which is needed for acting upon a particular transaction through the words or conduct of the principal and where the prudent individuals would form a view that the agent had the required authority for going forward with this task. Since the third party is made to believe that the requisite authority is present with the agent, even when the reality is different, there is a clear need to hold the principal liable (Owen, 2014). And an example of this could be inferred from the previous segment of this document. So, in case of ostensible authority, the principal would be liable even in absence of authority as a result of the doctrine of holding out, through which the principal is stopped from denying the presence of authority particularly due to the reliance of the third party on the representation made (Kelly, 2013). This can again be established through Hely-Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd [1967] 1 QB 549 case. Here also, the company was made legally liable for the actions which were undertaken by Richard as a result of the presence of requisite authority (Austlii, 2017). To conclude the discussion which had been undertaken through discussion, it becomes very clear that the scope of the authority is changed with the manner of agency creation. For instance, in express authority, the principal would not be liable for going beyond the express authority provided by them. And in case of ostensible authority, the principal is legally responsible even beyond the authority given to the agent. References Allen, W. T., Kraakman, R. (2016).Commentaries and cases on the law of business organization. The Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer law business. Austlii. (2017). HELY-HUTCHINSON v. BRAYHEAD LTD. Retrieved from: https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/SydLRev/1969/8.pdf Baidu. (2011). Freeman Lockyer v. Buckhurst Park Properties. Retrieved from: https://wenku.baidu.com/view/4f0019ec5ef7ba0d4a733b93 Bennett, H. (2014). Principles of the Law of Agency. Portland: Hart Publishing. Cohen, G. M. (2017). Business Law and Economics of Agency and Partnership.The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics: Volume 2: Private and Commercial Law, 399. Cooper Grace Ward. (2015). Companies and perils of ostensible authority: the danger of paying money to a third party and not to the creditor. Retrieved from: https://www.cgw.com.au/publication/companies-and-perils-of-ostensible-authority-the-danger-of-paying-money-to-a-third-party-and-not-to-the-creditor/ Cox, J., Hazen, T. (2016).Business organizations law. St Paul, MN: West Academic. Deodhar, R.P. (2013). Common Law Cases on Liabilities of Undisclosed Principal. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2195467 Fullan, M. (2014).The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. West Sussex: John Wiley Sons. H2O. (2013). Watteau v. Fenwick. Retrieved from: https://h2o.law.harvard.edu/cases/2442 Hynes, J. D. (2014).Agency, partnership, and the LLC: the law of unincorporated business enterprises: selected statutes and form agreements. New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis. Kelly, C. (2013). Reconciling the Irreconcilable: Ostensible Authority after Kelly v Fraser.King's Inns Student L. Rev.,3, 1. Krawitz, A. (2002). Protecting Outsiders to Corporate Contracts in Australia. Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 9(3). Lexum. (2017). T.G. Bright Co. Ltd. v. Kerr. Retrieved from: https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/3580/index.do Owen, D. (2014).Products Liability Law, 3d (Hornbook Series). St Paul, MN: West Academic.